TOP GUIDELINES OF UOCOMING CASE LAW SANJHA VS STATE

Top Guidelines Of uocoming case law sanjha vs state

Top Guidelines Of uocoming case law sanjha vs state

Blog Article

77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID expected) to criminal and traffic case information within the general district courts for your purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.

139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been on the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're issue to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion may be regarded, however, we are clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy matter to the approval of your competent authority.

Power to levy tax also to legislate on immovable property which includes tax on once-a-year rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)

The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[4]

Any court may perhaps search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of such a distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be made and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is put in its place.

If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only completed In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

ten. Without touching the merits on the case of the issue of yearly increases inside the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible from read more the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to become made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more

competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them for being healthy for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)

Report this page